Near term mitigation policy for global change under uncertainty: Minimizing the expected cost of meeting unknown concentration thresholds
نویسنده
چکیده
An aggregate integrated assessment model is used to investigate the relative merits of hedging over the near term against the chance that atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide will be limited as a matter of global policy. Hedging strategies are evaluated given near term uncertainty about the targeted level of limited concentrations and the trajectory of future carbon emissions. All uncertainty is resolved in the year 2020, and strategies that minimize the expected discounted value of the long term cost of abatement, including the extra cost of adjusting downstream to meet unexpected concentration limits along unanticipated emission trajectories, are identified. Even with uncertainties that span current wisdom on emission futures and restriction thresholds that run from 550 ppm through 850 ppm, the results offer support for at most modest abatement response over the next several decades to the threat of global change.
منابع مشابه
Climate. To hedge or not against an uncertain climate future?
I t has been over a decade since Nordhaus (1) published his seminal paper on mitigation policy for climate change. His question was “To slow or not to slow?”; his answer was derived from a traditional costbenefit approach. He found that a tax levied on fossil fuel in proportion to its carbon content, which would climb over time at roughly the rate of interest, maximized global welfare. Although...
متن کاملAre Uncertainties in Climate and Energy Systems a Justification for Stronger Near-term Mitigation Policies? Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change
Defining long-run stabilization targets for atmospheric CO2 is ultimately a political question since it depends on value judgments. However, because of the enormous uncertainties that surround projections of climate change, their impacts and mitigation costs, any proposed stabilization target is, quite expectedly, controversial. This uncertainty, some have argued, implies that climatic change m...
متن کاملElectricity Generation and Emissions Reduction Decisions under Uncertainty: A General Equilibrium Analysis
The electric power sector, which accounts for approximately 40% of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions, will be a critical component of any policy the U.S. government pursues to confront climate change. In the context of uncertainty in future policy limiting emissions and future technology costs, society faces the following question: What should the electricity mix we build in the next decade look li...
متن کاملDelayed action and uncertain targets : how much will climate policy cost ?
Despite the growing concern about actual on-going climate change, there is little consensus about the scale and timing of actions needed to stabilise the concentrations of greenhouse gases. Many countries are unwilling to implement effective mitigation strategies, at least in the short-term, and no agreement on an ambitious global stabilisation target has yet been reached. It is thus likely tha...
متن کاملMeeting Concentration Targets in the Post-kyoto World: Does Kyoto Further a Least Cost Strategy?
Preliminary analysis based on an aggregate model of global carbon emissions suggests that constraining emissions to the levels that would be imposed by compliance with the results of the Kyoto negotiations can increase the discounted cost of ultimately limiting atmospheric concentrations. Kyoto targets can be either too restrictive or too permissive depending upon the (currently unknown) trajec...
متن کامل